Dispelling myths about Arabic speakers – The Optus billboard

Glenn - The Census Expert

Glenn is our resident Census expert. After ten years working at the ABS, Glenn's deep knowledge of the Census has been a crucial input in the development of our community profiles. These tools help everyday people uncover the rich and important stories about our communities that are often hidden deep in the Census data. Glenn is also our most prolific blogger - if you're reading this, you've just finished reading one of his blogs. Take a quick look at the front page of our blog and you'll no doubt find more of Glenn's latest work. As a client manager, Glenn travels the country giving sought-after briefings to councils and communities (these are also great opportunities for Glenn to tend to his rankings in Geolocation games such as Munzee and Geocaching).

You may also like...

6 Responses

  1. Great blog Glenn – true mythbusting – what we need in these times when many people get their “facts” from the tabloid press or in 140 characters off Twitter.

  2. ER says:

    can someone please forward this to Pauline Hanson?!

  3. Agree with Simone – a good set of facts and figures to use as needed.

  4. Jeremy says:

    Glenn, the more stats like this the public are made aware of, the better off we’ll all be. So thanks.

    But hiding certain stats can be just as bad as highlighting others. E.g. what percentage of terrorists are Christian vs Buddhist vs Hindu vs Muslim? Does any one religion single itself out as being a potential threat?

    Perhaps stats like that can be automatically fed into the dept. of immigration to limit who is let in, free of any bias. It’s all about the numbers, right? Using numbers in that way can’t possibly be deemed as xenophobic – it’s just the facts.

    • Thanks for the comment! Of course I don’t have those figures on me. The perception at the moment is certainly that a few fundamentalist groups within Islam are the major potential threat, as I’m sure you’re aware.

      You would need to define “terrorist” of course.There are plenty of grey areas. Let’s not forget that Australia’s worst mass murderer was completely home grown and not religiously motivated.

      But let’s say you did that, and found that 50% of people on terrorist watch lists were Muslims. Does this warrant screening out ALL people of that particular faith from our immigration numbers? What if that represented only 0.01% of all Muslims, vs 0.005% of all other religions (and I don’t have the numbers but suspect you’ll find it’s somewhere in that order)? I think that would be grossly unfair to the vast majority who become tarnished with the same brush.

      Also, this is a religion we’re talking about, and certain fundamentalist cults within it, at that. As I believe happened in the billboard example, it often gets conflated with a race (or a language). Screening people on the basis of religion won’t work because anyone who was truly motivated towards murder and terror could easily lie about their religion – it’s not a genetic characteristic after all – I can’t tell a Muslim from a Christian, Buddhist or atheist simply by appearance, when you take away obvious religious accoutrements like the burka.

      Another good thing to remember is that despite all the doom and gloom, we still live in the most peaceful and safest time there has ever been in history.

  5. Andrew McLaren says:

    This article is far too important to be confined to id.com. Please publish it to a wider audience.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

.id blog