Are empty nesters moving to inner-city apartments?
A common demographic stereotype these days is that suburban empty nesters, whose children have finally left home, are downsizing into the inner parts of our cities, particularly being attracted to large apartment developments such as Docklands in Melbourne or Darling Harbour in Sydney. This leads to articles such as Domain’s “Downsizers feeling the squeeze” about the price expectations of empty nesters moving from the suburbs. But how realistic is this? For the most part, our inner cities are the domain of young people, so what does Census data show about where those over 65 are moving, and who is living in those inner city apartments?
As .id’s population profiles, such as this one for the City of Sydney, show, inner cities disproportionately house the young. With large tertiary education facilities nearby, ready access to employment, lots of rental accommodation and the lifestyle attraction of the “bright lights”, they are all set up for people in their 20s.
In fact, migration charts show that for inner city areas, people move in at 18-24 and move out in their 30s, when they start to have children. Our inner cities mainly comprise small 1-2 bedroom apartments, not considered suitable in Australia for families. There are some exceptions where families are living in high density, but they are mainly in suburban centres with a lot of apartments, and cater for those born overseas, such as Bankstown – see Ivan Motley’s article “Is there a market for family-style apartment living in Australia?“.
See the migration charts for the inner suburban LGAs of Port Phillip, Yarra, Sydney, Waverley, Adelaide and Subiaco – all show gain of youth, loss of families, and much lower levels of population movement for over 55s, with some having small gains and others small losses.
Generally, our inner cities feature high density accommodation, while families prefer separate houses. It may seem logical that after children leave home, empty nesters want to downsize, but downsizing may not always be an option. Ability and motivation to downsize can be affected by the high cost of moving, the increasing numbers of children coming back to live with their parents, and a lack of local downsizing options where empty nesters can maintain a connection to the local community.
Generally, propensity to live in medium and high density housing in Australia peaks among those in their 20s, declines through 30s and 40s and starts to increase again in the 50s. It is only once you get to 85+ that proportions of people living in dwelling types other than separate houses again reaches the peak of 25 year olds.
The interesting thing is that if you separate this into “medium density” (townhouses, villa units and 1-2 storey blocks of flats) and high density (3+ storey blocks of flats), you find that there is very little propensity to move into high density as you get older, but a strong propensity to move to medium density. Now some of this will be affected by the fact that most retirement villages appear in the data as medium density villa units, but it’s also interesting that the high density housing which typifies Australia’s inner cities really isn’t favoured by the elderly to any great extent, with proportions of over 65s in high density only around 5% of the population.
Maybe this is an accessibility issue – a townhouse may be more age friendly than having to climb stairs – but most apartments have lifts these days anyway, so my guess is that it’s more to do with the location of that housing – older people, far from being attracted in large numbers to the inner city, tend to live in suburban and rural areas.
Interestingly, Adelaide, which alone among the inner cities of the state capitals features predominantly medium, not high density housing, has a net inflow of empty nesters (but still a relatively young population compared to suburban areas).
So, nationally there doesn’t appear to be a huge trend of empty nesters moving into the inner city, unless they lived not far away to begin with. If you look at any of the migration by age by location charts in profile.id, you’ll see that those aged 55+ move in lesser numbers than younger groups, and consistently move either to nearby areas, or to coastal retirement destinations. Inner cities rarely feature in the top 10 destinations. Eg, to pick some LGAs full of relatively affluent empty nesters in our state capitals.
From Sutherland Shire, empty nesters move to Shoalhaven, Eurobodalla, Port Macquarie or Gold Coast.
From Mitcham, they move to Adelaide Hills, Holdfast Bay and Alexandrina – seachange and treechange.
From Melville, they move to coastal retirement destinations Rockingham and Mandurah, with a small number moving into the city, Perth and Victoria Park.
From Monash, they move to areas of housing growth with new retirement accommodation, such as the City of Casey and Knox, as well as seachange retirement destinations like Mornington Peninsula and Bass Coast.
Note that for Monash, inner-city Melbourne does come up as the 10th largest destination for 55-64 year olds, with 32 people moving in between 2001 and 2006, and Perth LGAs also show a few moving into the City, so there are certainly a few moving inwards, it’s just swamped by the larger trends.
Overall, it seems that retirees moving outwards within the metropolitan area, or to regional retirement destinations are much stronger trends. Far from moving en-masse to the inner city, those aged 65+ are moving to outer suburbs where retirement accommodation is being built – perhaps they can get more value for their house sale proceeds there, and live off the rest of their investment, compared to spending it all on an inner city pad. So while the Domain article may have been warning about the pitfalls of moving to the city, it seems that empty nesters have long known this and have voted with their feet at least since the 2006 Census.
It will be interesting to see what happens in the future – with the 2011 Census results coming out next year, and a lot of high density development having happened in the last 5 years, this trend may have changed. Our forecasts for the Docklands area in the City of Melbourne, for example, do show an increase in over 60s over time, but still the bulk of the population will be young. Watch this space!
If you’re reaching retirement age and your kids have (finally) left home, we’d love to hear about what sort of house you have chosen to live in. Have you stayed in the family home, or made a change? Or maybe this applies to your parents – what have they chosen to do? Leave us a comment below.
.id is a team of population experts who combine online tools and consulting services to help local governments and organisations decide where and when to locate their facilities and services, to meet the needs of changing populations. Access our free demographic resources and tools here.
In our view the critical factor will be the location of our grandchildren. We have ideas, not yet realised, to build granny flats or live near each of our two daughters, who are in remote rural and outer suburban locations. If that does not work out, an inner city apartment looks attractive.
I’m interested in your views about how local papers, which are delivered through the letterbox or on the front lawn of residents homes, can capitalise on the growth in high density living given most have restricted access to either their front door and/or letter box. Obviously the internet plays a big part, but given most people prefer to read their ‘local paper’ in print, how does one overcome this obstacle?
Good point Kylee – and it’s a similar problem that the ABS has in delivering the Census. They have to negotiate directly with the building manager for each apartment block to get access for the Census collectors to go door-to-door. It’s tedious and difficult because residents aren’t expecting a knock on the door. This contributes to some of the high levels of “Non-Response” in the Census.
From what little I’ve seen, local papers often get left in the common areas of a building, not necessarily delivered to the apartments.
So I don’t have an answer for you I’m afraid. There is certainly a growing tendency for people to be concerned about security, and to lock themselves away behind multiple layers of it.
Glenn
Thanks Glenn. I’ve used your social atlas to help me better understand they demographic profile of people living in high density dwellings, and it appears the are certainly NOT the family type. My assumption thus becomes, people living in high density dwellings are probably not that interested in their local newspaper, given what we know is that ‘local’ newspapers become of interest once people start nesting and/or purchase a home. Do you have any other recommended resources for me to explore this theory?
Kylee – one of the best indicators of involvement in the local community is how often people move. Renters are far more likely to move over a 5 year period than home owners. Renters are also more likely to live in high density housing. Check out any atlas and you have a map showing % of rental and % of population mobility. That’s a good place to start.
Glenn
Hello Glenn, you have a great name…(sic)….. same as mine. I understand that you are the Census expert. I have just read your article “Are empty-nesters moving to inner-city Apartments?”. In that article you propose some questions to explain the statistics. Well, I am a Sydney-based property expert …… and still loving it after 30 years! I have done significant research to support a new Strata product I have developed that has the capacity to take the market by storm when I can find some seed investors to help me launch it one day. I can provide the answer for you as to why over 55’s do not move to swank new apartments. The Elephant in the Room is Strata Levies. At a time in their life when their income is diminishing, they are not prepared to sign-on for the next 25 years of paying $5,000 per annum plus, when they are looking to live on a Pension or Super savings. They can live in a Torrens Title house for free if they own it outright. Obviously Council Rates are payable on both (and apartment rates are cheaper than freestanding houses) …… however they will not sign-on for $100 a week plus for the rest of their lives……… My invention is Strata Title without Levies…… forever….. and it can be applied to Residential Strata, Industrial Strata, Commercial Strata, Retail Strata and Tourism Strata projects. I have had University assistance and completed thousands of interviews and THIS is the answer to your questions. I hope this has been helpful. Keep up the great work. I love your newsletters. I hope to engage your firm one day if I can ever get my amazing new business concept turned into a growing business…… One day……
This is a good point. Nevertheless with house prices at such astronomical levels, more and more older people see themselves with mortgages. So they can tolerate strata plus a reduced or no mortgage. Several high rise have been started around Albert Park that have much higher amenity and levies than you are quoting. The big attraction for older independent living is having a kind of gated community in the middle of town, swank facilities and on-site nurses with nearness to medical, rather than being out in the sticks in some independent living ghetto. Nevertheless – good idea and I wish you well.
Interesting but I wonder if things may be changing under COVID. I am 70 and live in a 4 story apartment block in S Yarra. While when I moved in 18 months ago it was totally full of young people, I am seeing more and more people over 50 here. This a good location, close to public transport, parks and hospital. The foreign students and backpackers have gone, the bright lights are only just turning back on, and the rental vacancy rate around here has shot to American 10% levels never before seen. I think we should keep an open mind on this one and be aware that things are not as they once were