Residents of Launceston are younger than the Tasmanian and Australian average, but the ageing of the baby boomers is the dominant population trend. The area is relatively low income but with an increasing high income population, and it attracts people into the area from across Northern Tasmania, and from interstate, particularly from New South Wales.


The City of Launceston, which is the most populous Local Government Area in Tasmania, has become the most recent addition to the .id community.  Welcome!  We’ve just delivered an online community profile for the City and 17 suburbs and districts suburbs based on the 1991, 1996, 2001 and 2006 Australian Census.  It uses Census data to tell the story of Launceston’s population – how it compares to the region and how it is changing over time. We have also provided a detailed social atlas for Launceston, which maps population and dwelling characteristics across the local government area.

The City of Launceston Local Government Area covers most of the urban area of Launceston. Some parts of the urban area also fall into Meander Valley and West Tamar councils, both of which have community profiles as well, and Northern Midlands Council, which currently does not.

Launceston is the second-largest city in Tasmania, but the City of Launceston council is the largest local government area in the state (Hobart, though having a higher population overall, is split into multiple LGAs).

These public resources will be available via Council’s website to all staff and the community. It will assist council with planning for service delivery, asset management, housing policies, funding submissions, investment attraction and advocacy work.  It is also designed to inform community groups, investors, business, students and the general public.  The information will be updated with 2011 Census data when it becomes available in 2012.

So what does the profile show about Tasmania’s largest council?

Among Launceston’s 17 suburbs and districts:

You can view the information for each suburb of Launceston in the community profile and atlas, including time series back to 1991.

A total of five Tasmanian Local Government Areas subscribe to .id’s information tools for evidence-based decision making:

  1. City of Devonport
  2. City of Launceston
  3. West Tamar Council
  4. Meander Valley Council
  5. Glenorchy City Council

You can see the full list of subscribers in your state, and access their profile, forecast, atlas and economy.id sites from the .id community client list.

If you enjoyed this article, visit our website at id.com.au or sign up to get updates via email and twitter (above), and feel free to share it. Leave us a comment and tell us what you find useful about community profiling.

More about the Author

Glenn is a Census data expert, having worked at the Australian Bureau of Statistics for 10 years and at .id fo...

View Full Profile »

a

Posted at 2:42 pm on June 08, 2011

bro when are you posting on ABS geography greater capital city divisions

  • Glenn Capuano

    Posted at 12:24 pm on June 10, 2011

    In the next couple of weeks – we’re just finishing it off. Trying to build the anticipation :)

a

Posted at 4:57 pm on June 10, 2011

Ha. Sounds good. Would I be able to request maybe that it include about the population that will be added/lost from each captial as a result of the redistribution (ie Perth gaining ~80 000 as a result of including Mandurah). And also could you possibly touch on an issue something many people are curious about – how is it that Mandurah (80km from perth) and Central Coast (about the same from syd get counted in their capital city divisions, when GC, the north of which is is only 30-40km from bris, and surfers is only 60 km (a lot less than centres counted in other capital cities) is not included in Brisbane (even when all the area around it is counted, it is literally hollowed out) when they are just as much a single pool of labor as cent coast/syd, mandurah/perth, etc, with huge numbers of people commuting, going to school etc. Is this not the purpose of the new divisions? If you could touch on this apparent discrepancy/irregularity i think it would answer a lof of questions. thanks!

  • Glenn Capuano

    Posted at 9:26 am on June 14, 2011

    Yep – agree the Gold Coast/Brisbane case does seem a bit strange, and I’ve already queried this with the ABS. I will certainly be mentioning it in the Capital Cities blog, along with other idiosyncracies. Also see my post “Is Melbourne’s population going to overtake Sydney’s?” http://blog.id.com.au/2011/demographics/is-melbournes-population-going-to-overtake-sydneys/

    which talks about some of these things.